Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

RACH Min.Access Level & RXLEV_ACCESS_MIN

Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #62564 Reply
    Bijoy
    Guest

    Hi Agha
    I’m not clear about what you said.Could you explain a bit more alongwith what things have you checked?

    Br\\
    Bijoy

    #62565 Reply
    Agha
    Guest

    Hi Bijoy,
    yes sure, let’s assume 2 cells of different sites but neigbor, cell A and cell B have low HSR Moreover DCR of cell A is also increased with increased of N200 drops increased.No hardware/Interference issue.whats the issue with HSR and what i hv to check?

    #62566 Reply
    Bijoy
    Guest

    Hi Agha
    Is it that the HOSR of CELLA to Cell B is poor & vice-versa?For rest Cells,the HOSR of Cell A is OK.

    Did I get it r8?

    Br\\
    Bijoy

    #62567 Reply
    Agha
    Guest

    Gud Day!!
    yes bijoy,only Cell A to Cell B HOSR is degraded and not vice versa and all HO from this culprit cells to other cells are fine.

    Thanks.

    #62568 Reply
    Bijoy
    Guest

    Hi Agha
    Pls check the following
    1.CO_BSIC-BCCH in vicinity of Cell A & Cell B.
    2.HO parameters of Cell A to Cell B definition & vice-versa.
    3.Try delete-create the neighbor definitions,both way.

    Br\\
    Bijoy

    #62569 Reply
    Agha
    Guest

    Hi Bijoy,
    Thanks for reply.
    i have check point 1 and 2 and no discrepancy found.on checking MAL clash was observed since from last 02 months and after correction issue resolved,but this low HOSR issue appeared from last 06 days.

    #62570 Reply
    pix
    Guest

    hi,

    so…

    A->B : bad HOSR
    A->x : good

    what about any other cells towards B:
    y->B : ?

    * how many HO requests from A->B
    * how many HO requests from A->A’s best neighbour ?
    * what is the cause of HO from A->B, if you can know it?
    * does this adjaceny really should generate so many HO?
    * how many HO Requests from B->A?
    * how many TRX in cell B?
    * what about TCH assignment failure rate in cell B (during call setup), what value is it?

    As said bijoy, don’t forget to delete/recreate the adjacency, that might work.

    Regards,
    pix

    #62571 Reply
    Bijoy
    Guest

    Hi Agha
    Any improvements?

    Br\\
    Bijoy

    #62572 Reply
    Agha
    Guest

    yes thanks alot Bijoy/Pix. issue is resolved after MAL correction.
    I have post a reply but its not posted, i do not no why??

    #62573 Reply
    Agha
    Guest

    first both sites lies in totally remote region and just neighbor to each other.below is yr req:
    *y->B::HOSR greater than 97%(Y is the cell of same site as of cell A)
    *HO requests from A->B::Avg 750(on Day level).
    *HO requests from A->A’s best neighbour:: 750(As it is the only neighbor)
    *cause of HO from A->B::H371F HO commands due to Better cell and H371C HO commands due to Uplink strength,
    * Yes
    * 10 TRX’s and no Blocking.
    *Yes TCH ASR follow the same trend as HOFR.
    And please also define(H371L outgoing HO commands due to other causes,what is other causes).
    Equip. is Huawei.

    #62574 Reply
    Bijoy
    Guest

    Hi Agha
    Seems the ghost of MAL frequencies has not left you n/w
    🙂

    Br\\
    Bijoy

    #62575 Reply
    Agha
    Guest

    Hi Bijoy
    that is RF:)
    and plz explain
    (H371L outgoing HO commands due to other causes),what is other causes.

    #62576 Reply
    Agha
    Guest

    Hi Bijoy,
    Awaited for ur response,plz.

Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)
Reply To: RACH Min.Access Level & RXLEV_ACCESS_MIN
Your information:




<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">