Home » Topics » Telecom Design » High SD drop
- This topic has 38 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 11 years ago by Bhaw Nath.
bjushka :RX_LEV_ACCESS_MIN = 105
Tauseef : 98% Utilisation……
I think it might be issues of MSS & MGW…..
If such then what can I check…..for this..
We can not change the RX_LEV_ACCESS_MIN = 105
This is our contractual with custmer..
I have two questions:
– is this happening only in hopping TRXs or in non-hopping TRXs?
– are you using NSN equipment?
I see that you have RXP = -105dBm, that is the default value, why dont you try to decrease to RXP = -100 dBm (only for one site to test what happen, if the alarm is cleared)
First I want to told u that I am working in NSN Equip…
Sorry We can not change the RX_LEV_ACCESS_MIN.
This is our contractual with custmer..If we need to change then required the approval from Custmer ……
But Custmer doesn’t Approve to change in all site of BSC..
there is no such type of alarm occured in the BSC.
Pls suggest me that
Which report can we fetch the TRX wise drop report…not cell or sector wise..
Is there any BSC, BTS ,TRX wise parameter activated or run the script any command for the same..
request pls help the same how to counter the report…
Can u explain anybody about AMR?
increase sdcch tsl. disable sdcch handover.. check 204 for localisation of failures…
Is it possible to increase total Network traffic by optimisation or by Marketing ?
- The forum ‘Telecom Design’ is closed to new topics and replies.