Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

Reply To: handover failure due to protocol error

#61759
ALU
Guest

Dear Pix,
Sorry for the late reply.Here is the data that you requested for 2 cells belonging to 2 different BSCs.Note that we have checked and there wasn’t any parameter modification at BSC level.Also traces are being done at A/Abis Interface and issue has already been escalated to RTAC.

Cell A Data Pre Post
HO_Out_MSC_2G_2G_efficiency_rate(GHOOMEFGR) (%) 99.02% 80.38%
HO_Out_MSC_2G_2G_success(GHOOMSUGN) (nb) 4241 4393
HO_Out_MSC_2G_2G_prep_success_rate(GHOOMRQGR) (%) 99.19% 98.45%
HO_Out_MSC_2G_2G_request(GHOOMRQGN) (nb) 4283 4977
HO_Inc_MSC_2G_2G_efficiency_rate(GHOIMEFGR) (%) 96.43% 85.64%
HO_Inc_MSC_2G_2G_success(GHOIMSUGN) (nb) 4725 2583
HO_Inc_MSC_2G_2G_prep_fail_rate(GHOIMPFGR) (%) 0.10% 0.13%
HO_Inc_MSC_2G_2G_request(GHOIMRQGN) (nb) 4905 3020

Cell B Data Pre Post
HO_Out_MSC_2G_2G_efficiency_rate(GHOOMEFGR) (%) 95.51% 85.06%
HO_Out_MSC_2G_2G_prep_success_rate(GHOOMRQGR) (%) 99.12% 98.56%
HO_Out_MSC_2G_2G_request(GHOOMRQGN) (nb) 4144 4391
HO_Out_MSC_2G_2G_success(GHOOMSUGN) (nb) 3958 3735
HO_Inc_MSC_2G_2G_efficiency_rate(GHOIMEFGR) (%) 98.51% 92.59%
HO_Inc_MSC_2G_2G_success(GHOIMSUGN) (nb) 4704 4401
HO_Inc_MSC_2G_2G_prep_fail_rate(GHOIMPFGR) (%) 0.00% 0.04%
HO_Inc_MSC_2G_2G_request(GHOIMRQGN) (nb) 4775 4755