Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

ATA 186 in this setup ?

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 18 years ago by Sharad.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #22021 Reply
    Sharad
    Guest

    Hi !

    I’m a SIP stack/applications developer.

    As part of a tie-up/inter-op exercise with a service provider, I received a userid (uid) & a password (pwd), a gateway IP (gwip), and a ATA 186 web-configuration page, wherein the uid & pwd were also displayed in the UID0 & PWD0 fields respectively, and gwip was displayed in the Gatekeeper/Proxy field. Use SIP was 1.

    I was asked by the service provider to test the setup by making a call to a toll free number (sip:1800xxxxxxx@gwip). When I send the required INVITE to gwip, it returns a “407 Proxy Authorization Required” error, following which I re-send the INVITE with “Proxy Authorization” field filled up (containing uid & pwd encrypted by using MD5 digest algorithm). The gwip now returns me “200 OK”.

    Now, it seems that uid & pwd are actually the ones which have registered at gwip beforehand. If this is the case, what is the role of ATA 186 in the above setup ? Why was uid & pwd configured as UID0 & PWD0 ?

    Kindly write to sharad@bhartitelesoft.com.

    Thanks,
    Sharad

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Reply To: ATA 186 in this setup ?
Your information:




<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">