Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Traffic HO lower treshold

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #64504
    TRFHO
    Guest

    Hi, everybody!
    I have a simple question – why traffic HO lower treshold can’t be below 50%?
    And a little bit more complex one – how can I overcome this problem? Lets assume I have Cells A and B. I want to load cell B up to 95% (not more) by taking traffic from cell A. Cell A load I want to keep below 40% till Cell B load reaches 95%. All other neighbour definitions must stay unchanged so that all moving traffic wouldn’t stuck anywhere. Any ideas how to ballance traffic in this situation?

    #64505
    pix
    Guest

    hi trfho,

    you know that ho algorithms and parameters are very vendor dependent, so your problem will have very different answers whether it is E///, NSN, ALU or Huawei. Which equipment are you working with ?

    Regards,
    pix

    #64506
    TRFHO
    Guest

    Hi Pix,
    I am using Siemens equipment.
    Yes, parameters change from vendor to vendor but basic ideas about load ballancing are the same with some exeptions.

    #64507
    pix
    Guest

    well, in ALU for example, you can define the “high load” threshold below 50%. As long as
    “high” > “low”
    you can choose the values you want.

    otherwise, you can use some “capture handover” causes, activated only when load A is below 40% and load B is below 95%. Typically called “preferred band HO” or “general capture HO”, and setting:
    EN_GENERAL_CPT_HO(A) = enable
    Capture_traffic_condition(A) = HIGH
    high_load_traffic(A) = 40%
    high_load_traffic(B) = 95%

    There you are, the ALU solutions… but not useful for Siemens, I’m afraid 🙁

    Regards
    pix

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The forum ‘Telecom Design’ is closed to new topics and replies.