- This topic has 6 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Hi all,
Can someone help me with the following issue?
what can the problem be if the BSIC measured in the field and the BSIC defined in the BSC doesn’t match.
How is that possible?
Thanks in advance.
Hello Flower,
You are probably not measuring the right signal. Could you describe your method ?
Other possibility, the BTS database is faulty. But that’s close to impossible : that should raise an alarm in the OMC-R. Have you tried re-apply the radio configuration onto the cell ?
Cheers
PixHi pix,
Thnks for responding.
I used my phone with the field test software.
e.g. On my phone i can see BCCH 115 and BSIC 47
And if i check on the BSC, then i see that there is a sector with the BCCH 115 neirby but with a different BSIC, the BSIC 47 and freq 115 belongs to a different cell in another city. I have checked several sectors, all with the same problem.
On my phone i have also seen a BSIC 49. How is that possible, i thought that the range is 00-77.regards,
flowerYour fieldtest software could be decoding the right bsic, but display the number as a decimal. You need to convert from Decimal to Octal..
And you will notice that 49 in decimal = 61 in octal.
BUT… perhaps you’re reading 39 🙂 that is equal to 47 in octal. You MUST be reading 39 🙂
So when you define 47 in the BSIC, it will be displayed as 39 on your software, just because it is using different format.
http://www.ascii.cl/conversion.htm
The column “OCT”, see how it increases:
00, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05 , 06, 07, 10, 11, etc.
The BSIC (= NCC + BCC) is in this format.Cheers,
PixHi Pix,
You’re completely right.
Many Many thanks for your help.
Have a nice day,
Flower
you’re welcome. I saved one flower today, I’ll save the rest of the world tomorrow :))
Hi erlang team,
What is the exact purpose using the BSIC in network other than Frequency reuseThanks in advance
