Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

incoming ho

  • This topic has 12 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 years ago by Harison.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #55529 Reply
    mouf
    Guest

    hi all

    i have e cell facing incoming ho = 0%. the cell is not congested, ho parameters are well configured. please help me!!!

    #55530 Reply
    adcguy
    Guest

    Hi mouf, are you able to initiate calls in that particular cell?

    #55531 Reply
    pix
    Guest

    hi mouf,

    e cell = external cell ?

    Then it’s probably a MSC misconfiguration. And if each cell belongs to a different MSC, then it’s even more probable than one of the two MSC is misconf.

    Check routing tables, LAC definition, CI definition, and whatever (i don’t know the details at all). One thing certain : inc ho = 0% means there are HO requests. Therefore the serving BSC is aware that the e-cell exists.

    Therefore, the description of you e-cell in your OMC-R is correct.

    Good news if you’re working at the OMC-R… Bad one if you’re a NSS guy 🙂

    Regards,
    Pix

    #55532 Reply
    mouf
    Guest

    Hi All,

    adcguy : response to your question is yes. The cell carried traffic and do outgoing handover .

    Pix,

    It is a misunderstanding. I mean “a cell facing” not ” e cell”.
    All neighbors belong to the same BSC , one LAC et…
    In Incoming, we ‘ve got no HO requests and no HO attempts.
    In outgoing everything is OK.
    (Alcatel vendor). The cell is not at a border location.

    Thanks for any help!!!

    #55533 Reply
    pix
    Guest

    Hi,

    There were similar problems in B8. Two possible actions:
    Restart OMU
    or change the BSIC (this i’m not sure… perhaps, you should rather try to delete the cell and recreate it from scratch)

    If nothing works, then you should raise the issue to your TAC. In which release are you?

    #55534 Reply
    mouf
    Guest

    Hi Pix,

    The release is B9.
    Thanks.

    #55535 Reply
    Alex_R
    Guest

    Dear mouf

    did u check uplink signails of this cell may be link inbalance exist ?

    #55536 Reply
    TNS
    Guest

    Hi, mouf.

    Are you sure parameter RxLev_min(n) is low enough?

    May be I should activate General Capture HO towаrd this cell ( just to get some requests )…

    BR

    #55537 Reply
    Mouf
    Guest

    Hi all

    I solve the problem of incoming ho by deleting and recreating all relations of my cell.

    thanks!

    #55538 Reply
    adi
    Guest

    Hi all,

    I have a poroblem in a cell in remote area have bad incomming and out going hanover.
    The distance between the nieghbor cells is 35 km antena height=75m
    im using erisson equipment TCC feature is activate on this cell.

    pls help..

    #55539 Reply
    Alexia
    Guest

    In calculating HOSR do we consider both incoming and outgoing??

    I have some cells with poor incoming but excellent outgoing handover successes.

    #55540 Reply
    pix
    Guest

    hi alexia,

    but then, in another cell, you have very poor outgoing and very good incoming % 🙂
    normally, you should consider only the outgoing ho in the HOSR.

    regards
    pix

    #55541 Reply
    Harison
    Guest

    Hi,
    I don’t understand the Incomming HO and Outgoing HO. Could you to give me their threshold?

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Reply To: incoming ho
Your information:




<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">