Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

Traffic balancing parameter 900& 1800

  • This topic has 7 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 5 years ago by Arvind Siwach.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #51355 Reply
    Emmanuel
    Guest

    Dear All,

    I have an issue with traffic balance between 900 & 1800 cells as we have just started the deployment of ZTE GSM 1800 BTS in our network.

    Can anyone please assist me with what parameters to modify to achieve this goal?

    My idea is that the MS is camped on 900 cells in idle mode and also do call setup,but immediately handover the call to the 1800 cell.

    Thanks for your recommendations.

    Emmanuel

    #51356 Reply
    pix
    Guest

    i won’t be able to help on your exact parameters, because i’ve never worked with ZTE before, but i can give you a strategy :

    – MS favour camping on 1800 cells (Cell reselect offset of 1800 cells should be between +4dB and +10dB, compared to 900 cells)

    – MS that sets up a call in 900 cells should perform a HO towards 1800 cells if possible (using a “push” handover), as soon as a 1800 cells is above a certain “capture” threshold (usually between -75dBm and -80dBm)

    – Better cell HO between 1800 cells and 900 cells (and vice versa) should be disabled (to avoid ping pong)

    – MS in a 1800 cells shall be able to exit safely to a 900 cells, by using an emergency HO as a “exit HO”. Therefore you need to use the DL HO on low RxLev with a value between -85dBm and -90dBm. You should have a difference of about 10 dB between the capture threshold 900–>1800 (i.e. -75dBm) and the exit threshold 1800–>900 (i.e. -85dBm).

    Hope that helps,

    Regards,
    Pix

    #51357 Reply
    Abdel
    Guest

    Emanual,

    Which BSC version are you using is it BSCV2.8 or the iBSC? I have some experience on ZTE, can you post your current parameters:
    1)Cell reselection PI
    2)CRO for 1800 and 900
    3)Temporary Offset
    4)Penalty time
    5)The Rxlev of the serving 900 and the target 1800 after the handover

    #51358 Reply
    Pix
    Guest

    5) The Rxlev of the serving 900 and the target 1800 after the handover

    –> that’s not a parameter…

    #51359 Reply
    Abdel
    Guest

    “5) The Rxlev of the serving 900 and the target 1800 after the handover

    –> that’s not a parameter…”
    Yes I know:), I mistakenly gave a number(5) but I just want to know the rxlev of each cell either b4 or after the handover.

    #51360 Reply
    anup kumar rath
    Guest

    Please describe the method of calculating the timeslot resource needed on Abis interface in BSCV2?

    #51361 Reply
    Munyaradzi
    Guest

    Good day

    I have the following config:

    900
    CellReselPI – 1
    CRO – 0
    Temporary offset – 0
    PenaltyTime,20s – 0

    1800
    CellReselPI – 0
    CRO – 5
    Temporary offset – 1
    PenaltyTime,20s – 0

    #51362 Reply
    Arvind Siwach
    Guest

    hello Emmanuel ,

    i have facing issue with ZTE ibsc that all secind subcell traffic 1800 shifted to 900 . not able to find any mismatch on bsc . can you please feedback what have you got from last posts .

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Reply To: Traffic balancing parameter 900& 1800
Your information:




<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">