Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

Erlang B Vs Erlang C systems

This topic contains 3 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  Mayank 1 month ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #42036 Reply

    Vishal Jagtap

    Hi,
    We all know that Erlang B and Erlanc C systems are dependent upon assumption of call blocking scenarios( and lot many…..but not the point of discussion)
    In a cellular system you have fixed no of radios and hence the fixed no of channels per site/sector. But the offered erlang traffic calculated in Erlang C system always shows less that Erlang B system. Why ?

    #42037 Reply

    Wallis Dudhnath

    The Erlang B formula determines the probability that a call is blocked and is a measure of the Grade_of_Service for a Telecommunication environment. Traditionally, it was used for “trunked” systems.

    The primary driving element with Erlang B is that it estimates, statistically, the probability that all circuits will be busy when a call is attempted.

    The Erlang C model is more focused on delays. It is a delay model as opposed to a blocking model

    VBR/ Wallis Dudhnath

    #42038 Reply

    Wallis Dudhnath

    Just a follow on.

    I just read the Technical Papers on this site. It provides an excellent explanation for Erlang “B” and “C”. Recommend that you look at the article.

    The cases for traditional “trunking” and Call Centers helps to see the application of Erlang “B” and “C”.

    VBR/ Wallis Dudhnath

    #42039 Reply

    Mayank

    I need a difference for study use

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Reply To: Erlang B Vs Erlang C systems
Your information:




<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre> <em> <strong> <del datetime=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">