Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

ANSI vs ITU-T SS7

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #38546
    AMIT
    Guest

    I am utterly confused about the ANSI & ITU-T varinants of SS7 being used. Cn it be said that GSM N/W s use iTU variant & CDMA N/W s use ANSI SS7 . Can anybody help me please

    #38547
    S.Vijay
    Guest

    Dear AMIT No Need to confuse,

    GSM-MAP Belongs to ETSI.
    IS41-MAP Belongs to ANSI.

    ETSI-Handles GSM+WCDMA Related Issues and Makes Related Standards.

    ANSI-Handles CDMA ( ONE,2000..ETC..ETC) Related Issues and Makes Related Standards.

    ITU-T – ETSI & ANSI Are members.

    ITU-T Mainly Concerns abt WORLD INTERCONNECTIVITY through any STANDARDS approved by it.

    Thatswhy ISUP Comes Under ITU-T.
    But still ISUP Has different EUROPE/AMERICAN/RUSSIAN Versions.

    But during interconnection they will use common Standard specified by ITU.

    Got it…?

    Rgds

    #38548
    AMIT
    Guest

    Thanks a lot Mr S Vijay.

    #38549
    AMIT
    Guest

    Mr S Vijay,

    Whenever we read any SS7 docs it gives 2 varinats of the Routing Label Part of teh SIO then under the SCCP/ISUP it shows 2 variants- ITU ( 4-14-14 bits ) & ANSI (5-24-24 bits). AS per what you tolsd ITU is handling integartyion of ANSI & ETSI stnadards . Then Why does they not mentyion any variant of ETSI. Any reason please ??????

    #38550
    S.Vijay
    Guest

    In this case ETSI+CHINA+JAPAN+RUSSIAN Standards follows ITU-Standard so no need to put special thing.

    But ANSI…Always differnt.

    US always want to make others to follow things.Most of the countries like ITU which comes under UN.

    So you can understand….

    Rgds

    #38551
    Mike Pierotti
    Guest

    I wouldn’t say US in general but MA Bell and her spinoff’s… They want everyone to follow thier standard …. LOL

    #38552
    GKM
    Guest

    If I may say so that US wants every one to follow them. We watch the world. Things are clear.

    This is expressed by some members in the SATELLITE Mags also.

    GKM

    #38553
    waleed
    Guest

    dear all americans have their own dimension and measuremnt differ than all others,you can see the car speed in mile,weight in lb,long by inches and so on..

    #38554
    SAJID
    Guest

    It is quite right that the Americas want their own stnadards but ome najor questions is that with their own ANSI stnadards will we were see CDMA networks seeing Inter-Operator roaming as we have International romaing between various operators in GSM

    #38555
    GKM
    Guest

    Yes.
    Americans follow
    fps – foot-pound-seconds
    Length – Weight- Time

    MKS – Meter- Kilograms- Seconds is follwed by many and considersed
    by the scientific community as easy to use and implement.

    Even in mappinging and survey they use fps. The managers, decision makers are comfortable with that system.

    We ( asians )are comfortable with both systems. We work like work horses. We know many languages. English is just one of them.

    They say we have MTI !
    Our english is better than most americans.
    Our technical capabilities are great.

    We are stuck with CAPITAL back logs
    Unnecessary socio-cultural problems
    leading to over dependence on them.

    GKM

    #38556
    Mohammed
    Guest

    I feel that the CDMA Technology can never attain International Roaming as is currently achievable in GSM networks. What say folks ?

    #38557
    S.Vijay
    Guest

    I think we can leave this Subject hereafter.

    It became like

    USA Vs WORLD – Telecom WAR

    Lets give some Break Here…..

    To be Continued….END

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • The forum ‘Telecom Design’ is closed to new topics and replies.