Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Reply To: SFH 1*1 with ALU B10

#67312
pix
Guest

hi ian,

i’ve no idea where is your TAC getting their info, on my side i didn’t see anything wrong with DTX, etc.
I will double-check again…
Could you send me by email who is your tac contact? This guy seems to know stuff that I don’t ๐Ÿ™‚ (it drives me crazy ๐Ÿ™‚ )

Regarding your settings, what do you think about this:

3) for HO settings :

We kept L_rxqual_UL_DL_H to 29 and set Offset_Hopping_HO to 10
>
> Default value is 39. Putting 29
> will increase your % HO Qual !
> Especially since your PC setting
> is at 29 too !
>
as well L_Rxqual_UL_DL_P=29 and Offset_Hopping_HO=10
>
> OK, value is good but it should
> be lower than your _H setting
> above. So if your *_H is 29,
> then your *_P should be 19.
>

and for PwrCtrl :

L_rxlev_UL_P=-87
> that’s higher than default. You
> should get better results with
> -90 or -93dBm

U_rxlev_UL_P=-77
> based on my value above, that
> should be -80 or -83dBm

That will decrease your UL power, therefore it will decrease your UL interference.

— caution — apply all proposals slowly, step by step. Maybe what I’m telling will not work in your network.

Have fun ๐Ÿ˜‰

pix