17th March 2010 at 13:56
#61519
pix
Guest
Atto,
Not much to think, really… You can be right, but look… I was thinking :
RACH min access level = RACH_BUSY_THRES
RxMinAccessLevel = RXLEV_ACCESS_MIN
When you look at the names, I find my solution to be more coherent, don’t you ? Those are just assumptions anyway…