Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content

Reply To: 3G-2G Handover Scenarios

#50430
paraHO
Guest

2G and 2.5 can survive perfectly well on it own. It really doesn’t need 3G.

3G is there because people have ideas and convince other to have those ideas. It is not logical to assume that what 3G offers is what the customer actual wants, it provides what the customer has been told they will have.

3G does need GSM/GPRS for at least teh following reasons:

– fallback when 3G doesn’t work or poor, ailing or no coverage spots (thus needs 2G spectrum)
– needs 2G Mast installation for co-location
– needs 2G Customers for traffic and revenue
– needs 2G and 2.5G networks for least cost routing
– etc

Getting away from the politics and studying the technical aspects, it is quite clever the way they have got the technologies to work together if I can set out this crude outline:

UTRAN
GERAN
GSM GPRS
GSM

using Inter Radio Access Technology (IRAT) because it requires (obviously) the symbiotic relationship to work between radio network, handset and USIM.