Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content

Reply To: HO PARAMETER

#46511
pix
Guest

hello promod,

Thanks for the qos report.

Unfortunately i didn’t manage to match the headers (indicators names) with the columns (indicators values).

Ok, what you could try to do :

1) HO THRESHOLDS LEV UL RX LEVEL ………… -102 dBm

2a) PC UPPER THRESHOLDS LEV UL RX LEVEL .. – 80 dBm PX .. 01 NX .. 01

2b) PC LOWER THRESHOLDS LEV UL RX LEVEL .. – 90 dBm PX .. 01 NX .. 01

1) Your UL threshold is way too high, sorry i didn’t notice that earlier. Those thresholds will force to trigger a UL HO eventhough the level is still within an acceptable range.

2a & 2b ) Those settings I’m proposing are not mandatory, but currently the power control is forcing the mobiles to emit with a strong power : it decreases the battery life (= less potential traffic !!) and it is always better to decrease the MS power (potential health concerns…)

Check out the call drop rate after changes, and in case of higher CDR, increase those thresholds by 2dB step increments.

In my opinion, you might also be in an area which is not covered well enough, which is the reason why there is no “power budget” handover, but only handovers based on level thresholds

Regards,
Pix